This crate is MIT licensed. Comments citing another decoder's internal symbols
and reproducing its tables verbatim create licence risk that no engineering
benefit justifies, so every such citation is replaced with the primary source:
ETSI TS 102 114 §5.3.1.
Eleven sites across src/mux/codec/dts.rs and src/mux/mp4/audio.rs. The technical
substance is unchanged in every case — the deficit-sample-count semantics, the
reserved-field skips, the invalid LFF value, and the 16 legal AMODE codes are all
spec facts and are now attributed as such. Four CHANGELOG entries that named a
validator are reworded; the "no a reference decoder" dependency claim stays, since stating
what this project does NOT depend on carries no risk.
I initially argued this was a false positive on the grounds that the project's
hygiene rules name internal infrastructure and reverse-engineering material, not
open-source citations, and that a channel-count table from a standard is fact
rather than expression. That reasoning missed the point: the exposure is MIT
distributing text derived from GPL/LGPL sources, and that is the maintainer's
risk to weigh, not mine. Reversed in full.
Matthew Jackson
50f37462db